| 翻訳と辞書 |
| Cooks Source infringement controversy ： ウィキペディア英語版 |
Cooks Source infringement controversy
The ''Cooks Source'' infringement controversy occurred in November 2010, when ''Cooks Source'', a free, advertising-supported publication distributed in the New England region of the United States, became the center of a copyright infringement dispute after the magazine reprinted an online article without permission of the author. The controversy was fueled by social media and crowdsourced investigations finding additional alleged infringement and plagiarism. The incident became an international topic of news and analysis, which expanded to become an internet meme. On the issue of copyright, the incident illustrates that "masses of Internet users are very good at finding examples of copyright infringement, which counterbalances how easy the Internet has made plagiarism in the first place." At the same time, the response by the ''Cooks Source'' editor "may well become a digital textbook example of how not to respond to grievances in the internet age."〔Smith, Matt (November 5, 2010). (Cooks Source magazine creates internet firestorm with story on apple pie. ) ''City Pages''〕 The incident was named journalistic Error of the Year for 2010 by Craig Silverman of website Regret the Error.〔Silverman, Craig. (Crunks 2010: The Year in Media Errors and Corrections ). Regret the Error, 2010-12-08.〕 The fallout from the controversy drove ''Cooks Source'' out of business within two weeks of it breaking in full.〔
==Background==
As reported by Dan Crowley of the local ''Daily Hampshire Gazette'', ''Cooks Source'' was founded in 1997 by Judith D. Griggs, a former town planner〔Hamel, Chris (December 12, 2007). (Warren to seek town planner. ) ''The Republican''〕〔Ellery, J.P. (December 14, 2007). (Selectman denies bullying in heavy-duty discussion. ) ''Telegram & Gazette''〕 and conservation agent,〔Devlin, Emily (August 19, 2009). (Agent fired over heated remarks. ) ''Sentinel & Enterprise''〕 who had art directed and edited several small magazines previously. The magazine stated its goal was "to help educate readers about sustainable sources of foods and products, farms, cooking, restaurants and businesses," and to provide a marketing tool for small businesses and farms which create and sell food for local businesses and consumers. At the time of the incident, ''Cooks Source'' was published by Cooks Source Publications in the second-floor office of a rented duplex in Sunderland, Massachusetts, almost north of Springfield. Griggs, who was 59 years old at the time of the incident, hand-delivered the monthly publication with her adult daughter along a 2,000-mile distribution route to locations in western New England, including Massachusetts, Connecticut, Vermont, and some of New Hampshire. The magazine's circulation varied, but it was under 10,000 a month.〔
Griggs rose to internet notoriety on November 4, 2010, after it became known that an article published on page 10 in the October 2010 ''Cooks Source'' issue infringed on the copyright of Monica Gaudio, the piece's author.〔Pegoraro, Rob (November 4, 2010). (''Cooks Source'' magazine masters new recipe: How to annoy the Internet. ) ''Washington Post''〕 In 2005, Gaudio had published the copyrighted piece under the title "A Tale of Two Tarts" on a website devoted to medieval cookery.〔Gaudio, Monica (2005). (A Tale of Two Tarts. ) via ''Gode Cookery'', accessed November 14, 2010〕
Gaudio was credited in ''Cooks Source'' for the 1,300-word piece, which was retitled "As American As Apple Pie — Isn't!" and was revised from Gaudio's original in places. Griggs neither paid Gaudio nor notified her when the piece had run.〔Lynch, Rene (November 4, 2010). (Daily Dish: ''Cooks Source'' magazine vs. the Web. ) ''Los Angeles Times''〕〔DiceCast Episode 12: Interview with Monica Gaudio (by Polymancer Studios). November 15, 2010 ()〕 Gaudio notified Griggs of the infringement and asked for an apology and a small donation to the Columbia School of Journalism. (Gaudio chose the Columbia School of Journalism so ''Cooks Source'' could easily comply with her request; she has stated that she is neither a journalist herself nor is she affiliated with that institution.〔) The ensuing response by Griggs "has become the stuff of internet legend,"〔Silverman, Craig (November 12, 2010). (Newsmangled: Cooks Source’s recipe for disaster. ) ''Toronto Star''〕 and said in part:
But honestly Monica, the web is considered 'public domain' and you should be happy we just didn't 'lift' your whole article and put someone else's name on it! It happens a lot, clearly more than you are aware of, especially on college campuses, and the workplace. If you took offence and are unhappy, I am sorry, but you as a professional should know that the article we used written by you was in very bad need of editing, and is much better now than was originally. Now it will work well for your portfolio. For that reason, I have a bit of a difficult time with your requests for monetary gain, albeit for such a fine (and very wealthy!) institution. We put some time into rewrites, you should compensate me! I never charge young writers for advice or rewriting poorly written pieces, and have many who write for me... ALWAYS for free!〔Gaudio, Monica (November 3, 2010). (Copyright Infringement and Me. ) ''LiveJournal''〕〔Bercovici, Jeff (November 4, 2010). (Cooking Magazine Gets Poached Egg on the Face. ) ''Forbes''〕
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
■ウィキペディアで「Cooks Source infringement controversy」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
| 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|